<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The delicious lesson - revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html</link>
	<description>Philipp Kellers weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bernhard Häussner</title>
		<link>http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html#comment-130358</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernhard Häussner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html#comment-130358</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. 
I added tags to all my Firefox bookmarks and even to the delicious.com ones. But I don't really use them. I just use the Firefox "awsome bar", type what I want and there it is. 
I Addition to you follow up post: I think foreseeing the future works better with classical categories (this may be the alternative for Kevin if searching isn't). I got some like "creating a website" "fun" etc. which are step-by-step tutorial and reference collections. If I would tag them the order and the subtopics are lost, so nearly always no gain. 

But tags really rock finding related pages. 

Maybe it would be nice to have delicious find related pages based on multiple tags. For example: Looking something up at Google and the deliciuos toolbar says: There are another popular website about this at http:/...
(I am using delicious mainly to share links too)

Anyway I don't have too much problems, because I've got only ~400 bookmarks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree.<br />
I added tags to all my Firefox bookmarks and even to the delicious.com ones. But I don&#8217;t really use them. I just use the Firefox &#8220;awsome bar&#8221;, type what I want and there it is.<br />
I Addition to you follow up post: I think foreseeing the future works better with classical categories (this may be the alternative for Kevin if searching isn&#8217;t). I got some like &#8220;creating a website&#8221; &#8220;fun&#8221; etc. which are step-by-step tutorial and reference collections. If I would tag them the order and the subtopics are lost, so nearly always no gain. </p>
<p>But tags really rock finding related pages. </p>
<p>Maybe it would be nice to have delicious find related pages based on multiple tags. For example: Looking something up at Google and the deliciuos toolbar says: There are another popular website about this at http:/&#8230;<br />
(I am using delicious mainly to share links too)</p>
<p>Anyway I don&#8217;t have too much problems, because I&#8217;ve got only ~400 bookmarks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Keller</title>
		<link>http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html#comment-98368</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Keller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html#comment-98368</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin.
No, tagging is not obsolete at all. In my &lt;a href="http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/10/remembering-on-the-web-5-reasons-why-social-bookmarking-doesnt-work.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;follow up post&lt;/a&gt; I clarified what I meant.

I think it's important to use tagging for the right purposes, otherwise it will never unleash its potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin.<br />
No, tagging is not obsolete at all. In my <a href="http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/10/remembering-on-the-web-5-reasons-why-social-bookmarking-doesnt-work.html" rel="nofollow">follow up post</a> I clarified what I meant.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s important to use tagging for the right purposes, otherwise it will never unleash its potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html#comment-98268</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 23:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html#comment-98268</guid>
		<description>If tagging is obsolete, what is the alternative??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If tagging is obsolete, what is the alternative??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phu</title>
		<link>http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html#comment-89951</link>
		<dc:creator>Phu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pui.ch/phred/archives/2007/09/the-delicious-lesson-revisited.html#comment-89951</guid>
		<description>Does Cédric really find other users by tags, or by "saved by.."? maybe the user dimension is more important than the tag dimension</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Cédric really find other users by tags, or by &#8220;saved by..&#8221;? maybe the user dimension is more important than the tag dimension</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
